Akposking
Newbie

Posts: 8
|
 |
« on: November 21, 2009, 02:29:59 AM » |
|
The Code of Conduct Tribunal has issued a warrant of arrest on former chairman of Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), Mallam Nuhu Ribadu. According to the tribunal, this has become necessary following Ribadu’s failure to appear before it to answer charges against him. Justice Constance Momoh, who issued the warrant, yesterday, recounted how Ribadu has frustrated the tribunal’s efforts to commence a full-blown hearing into his alleged criminal offence. He said the ex-EFCC boss has, on nine occasions, frustrated the work of the tribunal with frivolous applications. He said there was no other option than to compel him to return to Nigeria for trial, should he fail to do so voluntarily on the next adjourned date. Reacting to the ruling, counsel to Ribadu, Mr. Femi Falana openly dared the tribunal, asking it to go ahead and make such order. He accused the tribunal of acting a script, boasting that his client would never appear for trial until the tribunal was detached from the presidency. According to him, “this court is illegal and cannot be said to be properly constituted in line with section 36(1) of the 1999 constitution. The independence and partiality of this court is in question because it is obvious that this is a department of the presidency. This is an illegal tribunal.” Earlier, Shola Igbeyinka, who held brief for Falana, had sought the court for an order for the tribunal to furnish the asset declaration form signed by Ribadu while in office as EFCC boss. He said that section 36 (6B) of the 1999 constitution states: “Any person alleged of criminal offence should be provided with all the necessary materials to enable him stand trial” On his part, Kyari Ahmed, the prosecution counsel, said it was not in tribunal’s power to tender furnished asset declaration form to public servants and directed the accused counsel to the National Assembly, which he noted, was vested with such powers under (C) schedule 3, part 1 and paragraph 3 of the CCB Act. Justice Constance Momoh declined and said that the issue of certified asset declaration form had never been raised by the accused counsel before and insisted that the application was coming late. He therefore said, “Ribadu is wanted.” The tribunal also threw out an application filed by Ribadu, asking for a stay on the ongoing criminal proceeding against him, pending the outcome of two separate appeals he entered before the Abuja division of the Court of Appeal challenging the jurisdiction of the CCT to prosecute him. While dismissing the application, as a calculated attempt to thwart his prosecution, the tribunal maintained that Ribadu did not have the right to make such application considering that he is yet to be properly arraigned before it. The case has been adjourned to December 4, 2009 for arraignment.
|